Tuesday, April 19, 2011

Tax Wealth Like Work

Tax Pledge 2011: Tax Wealth Like Work

Why We Need to End the Special Tax Breaks for Capital Gains & Dividend Income

Despite the time-honored value of rewarding hard work, our tax code gives preferential treatment to income derived from pre-existing wealth, rather than income earned from work. Our two-tiered system taxes investment income, such as capital gains and dividends, at much lower rates than income from salaries and wages.
We believe capital gains and dividends should be taxed at the same level as ordinary income – a common sense policy that was also recommended by the Deficit Commission and was the law of the land as recently as 1990 under President George H. Bush.[i]

What’s wrong with this two-tiered tax system?

1) Rewards Wealth, Not Work
This two-tiered tax system is an affront to the core American value that hard work will enable one to climb the economic ladder. Unfortunately, wealth is what really pays under the current tax code, not work.
A comparison of two hypothetical cases demonstrates this gross inequity.
surgeonsCase 1: A neurosurgeon who is the first in her family to attend college, worked hard, broke through the glass ceiling, and now earns $400,000 per year will pay a top marginal income tax rate of 35 percent. This tax helps to support the public structures and services that have made and will continue to make her prosperity possible.
yachtCase 2: A wealthy heir who, instead of working, jaunts port-to-port on a yacht while collecting $400,000 a year in investment income from his multi-million-dollar inheritance, will pay a top marginal tax rate of only 15 percent.

The same preferential treatment applies across the income spectrum. For example, a family earning $50,000 from regular employment would pay a top rate of 15%, while another family earning $50,000 from capital gains would pay a rate of zero (see below).
Top Marginal Tax Rates Under Current Law
Married, filing jointlyRegular IncomeInvestment Income
< $16,75010%0%
$16,750 - $68,00015%0%
$68,000 - $137,30025%15%
$137,300 - $209,25028%15%
$209,250 - $373,65033%15%
> $373,65035%15%
2) Erodes the Progressivity of the Tax System
When we hear that the 400 wealthiest households, whose average income is $345 million a year, pay an effective tax rate of only 16.6%, it is easy to assume that it is because of blatant tax evasion and crafty accountants. The truth is that these 400 households pay very little because two-thirds of their income is in the form of capital gains and dividends, which are taxed at only 15 percent.[ii]
The general trend is such that the greater the household income, the greater the portion of it is coming in the form of investment income, such as capital gains and dividends. For example, the typical American household, with an income of $58,500, receives only 0.5% of its income from capital gains. On the other hand, those in the top 0.01% of income earners, with an average income of $35 million, receive over 44% of their income from capital gains. If interest and dividends are included, investment income comprises 56% of their total income.[iii]
Because income composition changes so dramatically as one goes up the income scale, the lower tax rates for capital gains and dividends erode the progressivity of our tax system. Instead of going up as income rises, the effective tax rate is hump-shaped. The highest effective tax rate is paid by households earning between $100,000 and $350,000, which are certainly not the richest households. For incomes beyond that, the effective rate begins to decline.
Effective Federal Tax Rate by Income, 2007
3) Showers Tax Breaks on Those Born Rich
A study conducted in the late-90s showed that 40% of Forbes 400 members were born with enough wealth to place them on the same list.[iv] Many other Forbes 400 members born to families with substantial wealth, though not enough to make the Forbes list, were still born with a huge head start relative to the vast majority of Americans.
In essence, some very fortunate among us are born with a tax break. Regardless of the paths these individuals have chosen, the income they receive from the capital gains and dividends of their family wealth is taxed at only 15%, not the top earned income tax rate of 35 percent.
4) Deepens the Racial Wealth Divide
The Civil Rights victories of the 1960s represented historic gains for African-Americans and other people of color. From the Voting Rights Act to the Civil Rights Act, legal rights long granted to Whites were guaranteed to all citizens, regardless of race.
These monumental changes, however, did not alter the fundamental economic order. Our country's wealth continues to be disproportionately held by Whites. That wealth has been transferred through the power of inheritance to each successive generation. Even today, Blacks have only 10 cents of net wealth and Latinos have 12 cents to every dollar that Whites hold.[v]
The special tax breaks for capital gains and dividend income flow overwhelmingly to Whites, who have substantially larger wealth reserves. A contributing factor is that people of color generally earn less than their white counterparts. For example, Blacks earn 13 cents and Latinos earn 8 cents to each dollar that Whites earn in dividend income.[vi]
With specific regard to investment income, Blacks have only 12 cents and Latinos have 10 cents of unrealized capital gains to each dollar that Whites have.[vii] Our country's two-tiered tax system rewards those who already have wealth, and yanks up the ladder of opportunity for those who don’t, deepening the racial wealth divide in the process.
5) Deprives Our Nation of Revenue Needed for Jobs and Other National Priorities
As deep and damaging budget cuts are made at both the state and federal levels, it is an outrage that the special tax break for unearned income remains. The reduced tax rate for dividends and long-term capital gains will cost $84.2 billion in 2011 alone.[viii] That estimate only accounts for returning the capital gains tax rate to the 35% level of ordinary income. Simultaneously restoring the top income tax rate to its pre-Bush levels of 39.6%, a position supported by UFE, would raise notably more.
Eliminating the special break for capital gains and dividend income would raise enough to completely avoid the massive $61 billion in budget cuts being proposed by Republican members of Congress. Alternatively, the revenue could be used as federal aid to states, eliminating a significant portion of the $112 billion in budget deficits faced by 44 states.[ix] Taxing the earnings of just the top 13 hedge fund managers as ordinary income, instead of the special 15% rate as capital gains, would generate enough revenue to pay for 300,000 teachers.[x]
Want to help fight this injustice? Take the Responsible Wealth Tax Fairness Pledge today!

[i] “Top Federal Income Tax Rates Since 1916,” Citizens for Tax Justice, January 2011.
[ii] “Historical Effective Tax Rates, 1979 to 2005: Supplement with Additional Data on Sources of Income and High-Income Households,” Congressional Budget Office, December 2008.
[iii] Same as above, Ibid.
[iv] “Born on Third Base: The Sources of Wealth of the 1997 Forbes 400,” United for a Fair Economy, October 1997.
[v] “State of the Dream 2011: Austerity for Whom?,” United for a Fair Economy, January 2011, p. ii.
[vi] Same as above, Ibid., p. iii.
[vii] Same as above, Ibid., p. iii.
[viii] “Estimates Of Federal Tax Expenditures For Fiscal Years 2010-2014,” The Joint Committee on Taxation, December 2010.
[ix] “States Continue to Feel Recession’s Impact,” Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, March 2011 – Link to
[x] “The Republican Strategy,” Robert Reich, February 2

No comments:

Post a Comment